![the bible experience is how many gb the bible experience is how many gb](https://images.pushsquare.com/0a6e8c7065f08/the-ps5s-unboxing-experience-is-largely-uneventful-but-the-console-is-robustly-packaged-and-many-of-the-materials-used-can-be-recycled.large.jpg)
The abundant presence of images in Athens ( Acts 17:16).The correct implication that sea travel is the most convenient way of reaching Athens with favoring east winds of summer sailing ( Acts 17:14).The proper title, “politarchs,” used of the magistrates there ( Acts 17:6).The presence of a synagogue in Thessalonica ( Acts 17:1).The proper location (Amphipolis and Apollonia) of where travelers would spend successive nights on this journey ( Acts 17:1).Consider the following details in just a single chapter of the Bible that have been confirmed by historians and archaeologists: Glueck and Albright focused their attention on the Old Testament, but what about the New Testament? Does it enjoy a similar level of confirmation? Actually, perhaps because it is more recent, the evidence consistent with the New Testament is more abundant. The narratives of the Patriarchs, of Moses and the Exodus, of the Conquest of Canaan, of the Judges, the Monarchy, Exile, and Restoration, have all been confirmed and illustrated to an extent that I should have thought impossible forty years ago. Thanks to modern research we now recognize its substantial historicity. Albright also asserted the accuracy of the Bible’s history. And, by the same token, proper evaluation of biblical description has often led to amazing discoveries. Scores of archaeological findings have been made which confirm in clear outline or exact detail historical statements in the Bible.
![the bible experience is how many gb the bible experience is how many gb](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/dpkh7TDBSqU/mqdefault.jpg)
It may be stated categorically that no archaeological discovery has ever controverted a Biblical reference. Regarding the Bible and archaeology, he stated the following: Nelson Glueck was the president of Hebrew Union College and a highly respected archaeologist whose reliance upon the historical accuracy of Scripture led to the discovery of 1,500 ancient sites. Skeptics frequently denied his existence until the discovery of this stone, which identifies Pontius Pilate as the Prefect of Judea. The Pilate stone provides archaeological evidence for the existence of the man who sentenced Jesus to death on the Cross.It also references the personal name of the God of the Bible (Yahweh), and very likely contains a reference to the “House of David” (this is debated due to an unreadable letter). The Mesha Stele describes Moab’s subjection under Omri, the king of Israel.Discovered in Israel, the Tel Dan Stele has been dated to the ninth century BC and mentions the “House of David,” shattering the long-held view of many skeptics that David was a mythical person.Consider the following items described in our article, “ Archaeological Finds.” Second, the Bible accurately reveals historical people, events, and places. Manmade religions are about what man can do for his god, but the Bible is about what God has already done for man. God Himself solves our problem by becoming a man and taking our punishment upon Himself. The Bible explains that man is sinful, deserving of God’s judgment, and that no amount of good works could ever remove our guilt. Manmade religions teach that a man can earn salvation through various practices and good works. Moreover, the Bible’s theme is quite unlike those found in other religions. Not only was it composed by at least 40 writers, on multiple continents, over a span of 1,500 years, but it is not what we would expect to find were it “made up.” The Bible also includes major moral failings of its heroes, yet most writings of other religions tend to whitewash the flaws of their heroes.
![the bible experience is how many gb the bible experience is how many gb](https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/51y35S5pOxL._AC_UL600_SR600,600_.jpg)
The Bible Is Unique in Contentįirst, compared to other “holy books,” the Bible is unique in many respects. So let’s look at three aspects of the Bible taken together to explain how we know it wasn’t simply made up. Surely, even the most ardent skeptic will have a difficult time believing that the entire Bible was just made up since many of its details are corroborated by archaeology and in other historical writings. We occasionally receive the following question: How do you know the Bible isn’t just made up?